The badness of discrimination

The most blatant forms of discrimination are morally outrageous and very obviously so; but the nature and boundaries of discrimination are more controversial, and it is not clear whether all forms of discrimination are morally bad; nor is it clear why objectionable cases of discrimination are bad. I...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethical theory and moral practice
Main Author: Lippert-rasmussen, KASPER (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2006
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Further subjects:B hierarchical versus non-hierarchical discrimination
B Discrimination
B Sexism
B Moral Status
B Harm
B valuation versus non-valuation-based discrimination
B direct versus indirect discrimination
B cognitive discrimination
B Racism
B (dis)respect
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The most blatant forms of discrimination are morally outrageous and very obviously so; but the nature and boundaries of discrimination are more controversial, and it is not clear whether all forms of discrimination are morally bad; nor is it clear why objectionable cases of discrimination are bad. In this paper I address these issues. First, I offer a taxonomy of discrimination. I then argue that discrimination is bad, when it is, because it harms people. Finally, I criticize a rival, disrespect-based account according to which discrimination is bad regardless of whether it causes harm.
ISSN:1572-8447
Contains:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-006-9014-x