Social Shareholder Engagement: The Dynamics of Voice and Exit

Investors concerned about the social and environmental impact of the companies they invest in are increasingly choosing to use voice over exit as a strategy. This article addresses the question of how and why the voice and exit options (Hirschman 1970) are used in social shareholder engagement (SSE)...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Goodman, Jennifer (Author) ; Louche, Céline (Author) ; Cranenburgh, Katinka C. van 1970- (Author) ; Arenas, Daniel (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2014
Em: Journal of business ethics
Ano: 2014, Volume: 125, Número: 2, Páginas: 193-210
Outras palavras-chave:B Voice and exit
B Responsible investment
B Engagement process
B Religious organisations
B Social shareholder engagement
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Investors concerned about the social and environmental impact of the companies they invest in are increasingly choosing to use voice over exit as a strategy. This article addresses the question of how and why the voice and exit options (Hirschman 1970) are used in social shareholder engagement (SSE) by religious organisations. Using an inductive case study approach, we examine seven engagements by three religious organisations considered to be at the forefront of SSE. We analyse the full engagement process rather than focusing on particular tools or on outcomes. We map the key stages of the engagement processes and the influences on the decisions made at each stage to develop a model of the dynamics of voice and exit in SSE. This study finds that religious organisations divest for political rather than economic motives using exit as a form of voice. The silent exit option is not used by religious organisations in SSE, exit is not always the consequence of unsatisfactory voice outcomes, and voice can continue after exit. We discuss the implications of these dynamics and influences on decisions for further research in engagement.
ISSN:1573-0697
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1890-0