Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”

The under-representation of women on boards is a heavily discussed topic—not only in Germany. Based on critical mass theory and with the help of a hand-collected panel dataset of 151 listed German firms for the years 2000–2005, we explore whether the link between gender diversity and firm performanc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business ethics
Authors: Joecks, Jasmin (Author) ; Pull, Kerstin (Author) ; Vetter, Karin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2013
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 118, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-72
Further subjects:B Supervisory Board
B G30
B Diversity
B Gender
B Performance
B J16
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The under-representation of women on boards is a heavily discussed topic—not only in Germany. Based on critical mass theory and with the help of a hand-collected panel dataset of 151 listed German firms for the years 2000–2005, we explore whether the link between gender diversity and firm performance follows a U-shape. Controlling for reversed causality, we find evidence for gender diversity to at first negatively affect firm performance and—only after a “critical mass” of about 30 % women has been reached—to be associated with higher firm performance than completely male boards. Given our sample firms, the critical mass of 30 % women translates into an absolute number of about three women on the board and hence supports recent studies on a corresponding “magic number” of women in the boardroom.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6