Corporate Social Responsibility and the Priority of Shareholders
In a series of articles, Thomas Dunfee defended the view that managers are permitted and at times, required, to utilize corporate resources to alleviate human misery even if this is at the expense of shareholder interests. In this article, I summarize Dunfee’s defense of this view, raise some questi...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2009
|
| Dans: |
Journal of business ethics
Année: 2009, Volume: 88, Numéro: 4, Pages: 553-560 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Corporate Citizenship
B Stakeholder Theory B Shareholder primacy B Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise B social initiatives B Gouvernement d'entreprise |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In a series of articles, Thomas Dunfee defended the view that managers are permitted and at times, required, to utilize corporate resources to alleviate human misery even if this is at the expense of shareholder interests. In this article, I summarize Dunfee’s defense of this view, raise some questions about his account and propose ways in which to answer these questions. The aim of this article is to highlight one of Dunfee’s contributions to the debate about corporate governance and corporate responsibility. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0314-7 |
