Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully

In a recent contribution to this journal, Patrick Tully criticizes my view that the doctrine of double effect does not prohibit a pharmaceutical company from selling a drug that has potentially fatal side-effects and that does not treat a life-threatening condition. Tully alleges my account is too p...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Masek, Lawrence (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2006
Στο/Στη: Journal of business ethics
Έτος: 2006, Τόμος: 68, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 143-151
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B material cooperation
B foreseen effect
B Proportionality
B Πρόθεση
B Natural Law
B formal cooperation
B principle of double effect
B intended effect
B Consequentialism
B Intrinsic evil
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 178562640X
003 DE-627
005 20230710120944.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178562640X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178562640X 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-006-9060-2-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Masek, Lawrence  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In a recent contribution to this journal, Patrick Tully criticizes my view that the doctrine of double effect does not prohibit a pharmaceutical company from selling a drug that has potentially fatal side-effects and that does not treat a life-threatening condition. Tully alleges my account is too permissive and makes the doctrine irrelevant to decisions about selling harmful products. In the following paper, I respond to Tully’s objections and show that he misinterprets my position and misstates some elements of the doctrine of double effect. I also show how the doctrine constrains some decisions about marketing drugs with potentially fatal side-effects. 
601 |a doctrina 
650 4 |a Proportionality 
650 4 |a principle of double effect 
650 4 |a Natural Law 
650 4 |a material cooperation 
650 4 |a Intrinsic evil 
650 4 |a Intention 
650 4 |a intended effect 
650 4 |a formal cooperation 
650 4 |a foreseen effect 
650 4 |a Consequentialism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 68(2006), 2, Seite 143-151  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g pages:143-151 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123903  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033685278 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178562640X 
LOK |0 005 20220112043629 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#E85E5A494AA3A60036C71203A3E0863A3CB8AEEB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123903 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Intention 
STB 0 0 |a Intention 
STC 0 0 |a Intención 
STD 0 0 |a Intenzione 
STE 0 0 |a 意图,打算,意向 
STF 0 0 |a 意圖,打算,意向 
STG 0 0 |a Intenção 
STH 0 0 |a Намерение 
STI 0 0 |a Πρόθεση