Jared Jackson’s Dilemma
Whether to use privileged information as a basis for a decision to sell stock is the central issue in this␣case. A conflict between a stockbroker’s perceived obligations to maximize clients stock values and protect their investments (fiduciary responsibility) and violating Security and Exchange Comm...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2005
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 303-307 |
Further subjects: | B
Insider trading
B fiduciary responsibility to investors B Nepotism B boards of directors B conflict of interest B integrity of financial markets |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Whether to use privileged information as a basis for a decision to sell stock is the central issue in this␣case. A conflict between a stockbroker’s perceived obligations to maximize clients stock values and protect their investments (fiduciary responsibility) and violating Security and Exchange Commission insider trading regulations must be resolved. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-004-3230-x |