Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty

Today's complex and decentralized organization gives rise to organizational needs for both loyalty and institutionalized whistle blowing. However, ethicists see a contradiction between both needs. This paper argues there is no such contradiction. It shows why earlier attempts to go beyond the d...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Vandekerckhove, Wim (Автор) ; Commers, M.S.Ronald (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2004
В: Journal of business ethics
Год: 2004, Том: 53, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 225-233
Другие ключевые слова:B complex organizations
B Business Ethics
B whistle blowing
B Decentralization
B organization ethics
B Loyalty
Online-ссылка: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:Today's complex and decentralized organization gives rise to organizational needs for both loyalty and institutionalized whistle blowing. However, ethicists see a contradiction between both needs. This paper argues there is no such contradiction. It shows why earlier attempts to go beyond the dilemma are not satisfying. The solution proposed in this paper starts from an organizational perspective instead of an individual one. It does so by reframing the concept of loyalty into “rational loyalty”. This means that the object of loyalty is not the physicality of an organization, but its corpus of explicit mission statement, goals, value statement and code of conduct. An implication is that organizations are – as their side of the duty of loyalty – obliged to institutionalize whistle blowing.
ISSN:1573-0697
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039411.11986.6b