Alienation and empowerment: Some ethical imperatives in business
The issue of worker alienation in the context of business ethics is critically examined. From a normative perspective, it is assumed that the minimal ethical requirement in business should include accountability for adverse consequences of management practice for workers in organizations. Using this...
Published in: | Journal of business ethics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1992
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1992, Volume: 11, Issue: 5, Pages: 413-422 |
Further subjects: | B
Managerial Action
B Adverse Consequence B Management Practice B Business Ethic B Economic Growth |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The issue of worker alienation in the context of business ethics is critically examined. From a normative perspective, it is assumed that the minimal ethical requirement in business should include accountability for adverse consequences of management practice for workers in organizations. Using this standard, managerial actions that are responsible for worker alienation are considered unethical. The nature of work alienation and the organizational conditions responsible for it are outlined. Several dealienation measures in the form of empowerment strategies for management are presented as ethical imperatives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00870553 |