The inadequacy of a Deontological Analysis of Peer Relations in Organizations
I argue for the inadequacy of the Kantian approach to the analysis of personal relations in business presented by Moberg and Meyer, in “A Deontological Analysis of Peer Relations in Organizations” (Journal of Business Ethics). It is unclear or implausible that the (mostly reasonable) principles of b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1991
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1991, Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-139 |
| Further subjects: | B
Personal Relation
B Reasonable Principle B Business Ethic B Business Context B Economic Growth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | I argue for the inadequacy of the Kantian approach to the analysis of personal relations in business presented by Moberg and Meyer, in “A Deontological Analysis of Peer Relations in Organizations” (Journal of Business Ethics). It is unclear or implausible that the (mostly reasonable) principles of business relations they advocate really do follow from Kant's theory. Kant's theory, and deontological theories in general, do not yield reasonable principles of personal relations, particularly in the business context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00383616 |