Common knowledge of the second kind

Although most of us “know” that human beings cannot and should not be replaced by computers, we have great difficulties saying why this is so. This paradox is largely the result of institutionalizing several fundamental misconceptions as to the nature of both trustworthy “objective” and “moral” know...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bella, David (Author) ; King, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1989
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1989, Volume: 8, Issue: 6, Pages: 415-430
Further subjects:B Computer Revolution
B Fundamental Misconception
B Common Knowledge
B Great Difficulty
B Economic Growth
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785599526
003 DE-627
005 20220112043431.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1989 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF00381808  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785599526 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785599526 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bella, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Common knowledge of the second kind 
264 1 |c 1989 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although most of us “know” that human beings cannot and should not be replaced by computers, we have great difficulties saying why this is so. This paradox is largely the result of institutionalizing several fundamental misconceptions as to the nature of both trustworthy “objective” and “moral” knowledge. Unless we transcend this paradox, we run the increasing risks of becoming very good at counting without being able to say what is worth counting and why. The degree to which this is occurring is the degree to which the computer revolution is already over — and the degree to which we human beings have lost. 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Fundamental Misconception 
650 4 |a Computer Revolution 
650 4 |a Common Knowledge 
650 4 |a Great Difficulty 
650 4 |a Economic Growth 
700 1 |a King, Jonathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 8(1989), 6, Seite 415-430  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1989  |g number:6  |g pages:415-430 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071919  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381808  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 8  |j 1989  |e 6  |h 415-430 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033658394 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785599526 
LOK |0 005 20220112043431 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#D862CB89A83B482E89B65E73B0F2B58A48E64E14 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071919 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw