Economic science and ethical neutrality: The problem of teleology

Two disputes have continually frustrated attempts to provide a tenable method of enquiry for economic science:, Should theory construction in economics include a commitment to moral principles? Or should economic theory remain value-free?, Does the peculiar subject matter of economics demand a ‘tele...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hodgson, Bernard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1983
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1983, Volume: 2, Issue: 4, Pages: 237-253
Further subjects:B Rational choice
B Subject Matter
B Economic Theory
B Moral Principle
B Economic Growth
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Two disputes have continually frustrated attempts to provide a tenable method of enquiry for economic science:, Should theory construction in economics include a commitment to moral principles? Or should economic theory remain value-free?, Does the peculiar subject matter of economics demand a ‘teleological’, or a ‘mechanistic’ pattern of explanation?, It is the aim of this paper to shed light on both the preceding controversies by seeking to clarify the relation between them. In particular, it is argued via a case study of the theory of rational choice that over-simplified mechanistic constructions have distorted the normative content and applicability of economic theory., Yet still in an explosively changing world, we have a fragmented economics · One reason for this goes deep. It is the lack of a philosophical basis for economic theory. Economic life is looked upon as deliberative action, and again it is looked upon as action determined by the combination of tastes and circumstances. Which is it? Can it be both? Nobody asks, and such problems being unrecognized, the diversity of hidden assumptions creates a babel of conflicting languages!
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/BF00383181