On Misrepresenting the Thomistic Five Ways
A number of recent discussions of atheism allude to cosmological arguments in support of theism. The five ways of Aquinas are classic instances, offered as rational justification for theistic belief. However, the five ways receive short shrift. They are curtly dismissed as vacuous, arbitrary, and ev...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Springer Netherlands
2009
|
Στο/Στη: |
Sophia
Έτος: 2009, Τόμος: 48, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 15-34 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Dawkins
B Atheism B cosmological arguments B Aquinas B existence of God |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | A number of recent discussions of atheism allude to cosmological arguments in support of theism. The five ways of Aquinas are classic instances, offered as rational justification for theistic belief. However, the five ways receive short shrift. They are curtly dismissed as vacuous, arbitrary, and even insulting to reason. I contend that the atheistic critique of the Thomistic five ways, and similarly formulated cosmological arguments, argues at cross purposes because it misrepresents them. I first lay out the context, intent and structure of Aquinas’ arguments, then show in what way recent discussions misrepresent them, and finally conclude with a comment on metaphysical orientation, which I take to be central, not only to a proper understanding of the Thomistic five ways but generally to the debate between atheism and theism on the existence of God. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-008-0089-9 |