Explanatory priority and independence: On an argument against middle knowledge
A Molinist should not embrace the independence thesis. He also can defend the thesis that counterfactuals of freedom depend on a counterfactual act. Although such a move may seem illicit in the sense thatexplanandum andexplanans presuppose each other, I defend the view that counterfactuals of freedo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1999
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 1999, Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-14 |
| Further subjects: | B
Causal Dependence
B Actual World B Counterfactual Dependence B Logical Priority B Explanatory Priority |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785588079 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02786329 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785588079 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785588079 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dekker, Eef |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Explanatory priority and independence: On an argument against middle knowledge |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1999 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A Molinist should not embrace the independence thesis. He also can defend the thesis that counterfactuals of freedom depend on a counterfactual act. Although such a move may seem illicit in the sense thatexplanandum andexplanans presuppose each other, I defend the view that counterfactuals of freedom are very deeply embedded in our metaphysics and we cannot therefore satisfactorily explain them with the help of other devices. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 601 | |a Knowledge | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Logical Priority | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Explanatory Priority | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Counterfactual Dependence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Causal Dependence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Actual World | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 38(1999), 2, Seite 1-14 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:1999 |g number:2 |g pages:1-14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786329 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033646949 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785588079 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043342 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#A0E3CF2A1BF9CF0791C4683F87DAD2A427877F4A | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 12-01-22 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
