Kérygme et imaginaire
There is an essential difference between canonical and apocryphal texts. The comparison of John 20,11-18 with a short passage from the « Book of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by Bartholomew the Apostle » (8.1-11.3) shows that the apocryphal text (in its hermeneutical status) loses the power of re...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1996
|
| In: |
Apocrypha
Year: 1996, Volume: 7, Pages: 235-242 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | There is an essential difference between canonical and apocryphal texts. The comparison of John 20,11-18 with a short passage from the « Book of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by Bartholomew the Apostle » (8.1-11.3) shows that the apocryphal text (in its hermeneutical status) loses the power of revelation constitutional of the canonical text (kerygmatic status). |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Apocrypha
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.300999 |
