The Royal Supremacy and Episcopacy ‘Jure Divino’, 1603–1640

Laudian divines cried up the king's prerogative. But they also affirmed that episcopacy was by divine, not human right. Was jure divino episcopacy, which many clerics asserted in the decades after Bancroft's famous sermon of 1589, in fact incompatible with the traditional English theory of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sommerville, J. P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1983
In: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 1983, Volume: 34, Issue: 4, Pages: 548-558
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784748846
003 DE-627
005 20220105043947.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S002204690003743X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784748846 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784748846 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sommerville, J. P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Royal Supremacy and Episcopacy ‘Jure Divino’, 1603–1640 
264 1 |c 1983 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Laudian divines cried up the king's prerogative. But they also affirmed that episcopacy was by divine, not human right. Was jure divino episcopacy, which many clerics asserted in the decades after Bancroft's famous sermon of 1589, in fact incompatible with the traditional English theory of the Royal Supremacy? Catholics and extreme puritans answered this question in the affirmative, and many recent commentators have accepted their judgement. The purpose of the present study is to question this interpretation, and to suggest that the first two Stuarts endorsed the theory of jure divino episcopacy not because they were misled by the rhetoric of such men as Bancroft, Barlow and Laud, but because they correctly perceived that these divines were vigorous supporters of the king's Supremacy in ecclesiasticals. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of ecclesiastical history  |d London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1950  |g 34(1983), 4, Seite 548-558  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785375  |w (DE-600)1466476-8  |w (DE-576)078707234  |x 1469-7637  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:1983  |g number:4  |g pages:548-558 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S002204690003743X  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/royal-supremacy-and-episcopacy-jure-divino-16031640/563FDD173390454C7AACBBDDEA9882CB  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 34  |j 1983  |e 4  |h 548-558 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4030053181 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784748846 
LOK |0 005 20220105043947 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-29#00A9DA2DAC8BDB32285F4B767B889E449B6B6BE1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw