Luke and Mark: With a Discussion of Streeter's Theory
Within the theory of two sources, Mark and Q, by which most modern critics explain the composition and interrelations of the Synoptic Gospels, certain questions still remain unanswered which deserve attention in spite of the present tendency to study the history of the tradition rather than the comp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1933
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 1933, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-55 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Within the theory of two sources, Mark and Q, by which most modern critics explain the composition and interrelations of the Synoptic Gospels, certain questions still remain unanswered which deserve attention in spite of the present tendency to study the history of the tradition rather than the composition of the gospels. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816000005009 |
