Cephas and Peter in the Epistle to the Galatians
In his note ‘Simon, Cephas, Peter’ in this Review (January, 1921, pp. 95–97), Professor Kirsopp Lake, calling attention to the existence of early evidence that in some quarters Cephas was thought to be a different person from Peter, wonders why “Christian tradition has so completely lost sight of th...
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1921
|
In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 1921, 卷: 14, 發布: 2, Pages: 187-193 |
在線閱讀: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
總結: | In his note ‘Simon, Cephas, Peter’ in this Review (January, 1921, pp. 95–97), Professor Kirsopp Lake, calling attention to the existence of early evidence that in some quarters Cephas was thought to be a different person from Peter, wonders why “Christian tradition has so completely lost sight of these doubts, which were clearly present in various forms to Clement of Alexandria and to the still earlier writer of the Epistola Apostolorum.” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816000033095 |