Stability, natural rights, and the limits of prudence
This essay investigates Prof. Nigel Biggar’s critique of natural rights and his subsequent reliance upon “prudence” to secure positive rights for citizens. It offers a modest defense of natural rights as explanatory for certain intuitions, while raising questions about whether positive rights are su...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021
|
| In: |
Anglican theological review
Year: 2021, Volume: 103, Issue: 4, Pages: 402-408 |
| Further subjects: | B
Karl Barth
B positive rights B Political Theology B Nigel Biggar B natural rights |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This essay investigates Prof. Nigel Biggar’s critique of natural rights and his subsequent reliance upon “prudence” to secure positive rights for citizens. It offers a modest defense of natural rights as explanatory for certain intuitions, while raising questions about whether positive rights are sufficiently stable on Prof. Biggar’s view. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-6214 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Anglican theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/00033286211028793 |