Ontos and Theos: A Case for Neo-ontotheology
This case for a neo-ontotheology responds to the postmodernist rejection of traditional ontotheology, resulting in a re-examination of the relation of ontos and theos. Rejections by Merold Westphal, John Caputo, and Mark Taylor are critiqued. The re-examination employs deconstructive, analogical, an...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2012
|
| In: |
Theology today
Year: 2012, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 213-224 |
| Further subjects: | B
Postmodernism
B prime conditions B Deconstruction B Being B Ontotheology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | This case for a neo-ontotheology responds to the postmodernist rejection of traditional ontotheology, resulting in a re-examination of the relation of ontos and theos. Rejections by Merold Westphal, John Caputo, and Mark Taylor are critiqued. The re-examination employs deconstructive, analogical, and hermeneutical methods, affirms ontos and theos by pointing outside text, recognizes primal conditions as a ground for order and sense, and exercises a praxis of language usage and contemplative practice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2556 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology today
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040573612443545 |