Contesting confessions: Connolly's Augustinian Imperative and Bakhtin's dialogical imperative
While applauding Connolly's post-secular pluralism and objection to demonizing others, this article finds undialogical and ahistorical his account of “Augustine's Imperative.” Modern Augustinians should be consulted, notably Barth on God's time and predestination and Tillich on the de...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2011
|
| Em: |
Theology today
Ano: 2011, Volume: 68, Número: 3, Páginas: 272-289 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Augustine
B William E. Connolly B confessional discourse B demonizing others B Tillich B Evil B dialogical B Bakhtin |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Não eletrônico
|
| Resumo: | While applauding Connolly's post-secular pluralism and objection to demonizing others, this article finds undialogical and ahistorical his account of “Augustine's Imperative.” Modern Augustinians should be consulted, notably Barth on God's time and predestination and Tillich on the demonic. Bakhtin's dialogical reading of confessional discourse calls for a hermeneutics, not only of suspicion or retrieval but of the peace which passes all understanding. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2556 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Theology today
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040573611416700 |
