The Beginning
“What creationists are really saying is that God is real and responsible for creation, so scientific proof in support of evolution seems irrelevant to them. What evolutionists are really saying is that the scientific method is valid and is the most effective means of maintaining objectivity in the s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publ.
1982
|
In: |
Theology today
Year: 1982, Volume: 39, Issue: 3, Pages: 249-259 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | “What creationists are really saying is that God is real and responsible for creation, so scientific proof in support of evolution seems irrelevant to them. What evolutionists are really saying is that the scientific method is valid and is the most effective means of maintaining objectivity in the search for truth, so philosophical or theological arguments in support of creationism seem irrelevant. Is it any wonder that neither side is successful in influencing the other? They only appear to be debating the evolution/creationism controversy; each side is actually debating and defending something quite different.” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2044-2556 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology today
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/004057368203900302 |