The Religion Clauses of the First Amendment: Guarantees of States' Rights?
This book is not for the casual reader of constitutional law. Although a slim volume, it contains a weighty discussion of the history of US constitutional development that asks whether there is any support in history for the currently popular jurisdictional/states' rights interpretative theory....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
In: |
A journal of church and state
Year: 2012, Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 449-450 |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This book is not for the casual reader of constitutional law. Although a slim volume, it contains a weighty discussion of the history of US constitutional development that asks whether there is any support in history for the currently popular jurisdictional/states' rights interpretative theory. Advocates of jurisdictional/states' rights theory, such as Kurt Lash, Steven Smith, and others, argue that the US Constitution's First Amendment (“Congress shall make no law…”) was not a guarantee of religious freedom but a jurisdictional prohibition against the federal government enacting laws regarding religion, reserving to the states the right to legislate as they please. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2040-4867 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: A journal of church and state
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jcs/css063 |