The Pretenses of Loyalty: Locke, Liberal Theory, and American Political Theology. By John Perry

The author Salman Rushdie, famously sent into hiding due to a fatwa, once quipped ‘No, I don’t think it’s fair to label Islam “violent.” But I will say that to my knowledge, no writer has ever gone into hiding for criticizing the Amish.’ Rushdie’s comment is another iteration of the long-running bou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cowan, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 870-872
Review of:The pretenses of loyalty (New York, NY [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2011) (Cowan, David)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The author Salman Rushdie, famously sent into hiding due to a fatwa, once quipped ‘No, I don’t think it’s fair to label Islam “violent.” But I will say that to my knowledge, no writer has ever gone into hiding for criticizing the Amish.’ Rushdie’s comment is another iteration of the long-running boundary dispute between religion and state and it is easy to think of Rushdie as the poster child for religious toleration before 9/11; but equally, could his statement imply that the Amish are simply being good American Lockeans, faithful to the founding fathers’ sense of Lockean toleration? It is this question of toleration, and to whom we owe loyalty, chiefly in the American context, which is given an insightful and careful assessment by John Perry.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flt081