The Author of the Against Hierocles: A Response to Borzì and Jones

Serious criticisms of Tomas Hägg’s argument that the Contra Hieroclem was not the work of Eusebius of Caesarea (in spite of manuscript attribution to him) have recently been presented (independently of each other) by Salvatore Borzì and Christopher Jones. Neither of them is sufficiently compelling t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, Aaron P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2013
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 574-594
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783732520
003 DE-627
005 20211229043534.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flt129  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783732520 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783732520 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Johnson, Aaron P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Author of the Against Hierocles: A Response to Borzì and Jones 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Serious criticisms of Tomas Hägg’s argument that the Contra Hieroclem was not the work of Eusebius of Caesarea (in spite of manuscript attribution to him) have recently been presented (independently of each other) by Salvatore Borzì and Christopher Jones. Neither of them is sufficiently compelling to refute Hägg’s suspicions, which appear to be correct upon further consideration. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 64(2013), 2, Seite 574-594  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:574-594 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640973001  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971465  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt129  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/64/2/574/1715978  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027421000 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783732520 
LOK |0 005 20211229043534 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#E586C8E9370E3A5A71FF51FC1DE743B0816891EA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971465 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw