The Author of the Against Hierocles: A Response to Borzì and Jones
Serious criticisms of Tomas Hägg’s argument that the Contra Hieroclem was not the work of Eusebius of Caesarea (in spite of manuscript attribution to him) have recently been presented (independently of each other) by Salvatore Borzì and Christopher Jones. Neither of them is sufficiently compelling t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 574-594 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Serious criticisms of Tomas Hägg’s argument that the Contra Hieroclem was not the work of Eusebius of Caesarea (in spite of manuscript attribution to him) have recently been presented (independently of each other) by Salvatore Borzì and Christopher Jones. Neither of them is sufficiently compelling to refute Hägg’s suspicions, which appear to be correct upon further consideration. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flt129 |