Il Commento a Matteo di Origene: Atti del X Convegno di Studi del Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca su Origene e la Tradizione Alessandrina (Napoli 24–26 settembre 2008). Edited by Teresa Piscitelli
The survival of Origen’s Commentary on Matthew in Greek and Latin versions, both defective, has merely compounded the difficulties of scholars, since the two versions are often intractably at odds. The importance and obscurity of the question fully justify the length of the first contribution to thi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 1, Pages: 264-265 |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The survival of Origen’s Commentary on Matthew in Greek and Latin versions, both defective, has merely compounded the difficulties of scholars, since the two versions are often intractably at odds. The importance and obscurity of the question fully justify the length of the first contribution to this volume, in which Luciano Bassano, citing the discoveries at Tura in partial vindication of Klostermann’s cautious editing of the standard text, concludes that the Greek and Latin redactions are independent witnesses to the creativity of Origenism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flt014 |