The Strata of the Priestly Writings: Contemporary Debate and Future Directions. Edited by Sarah Schectman and Joel S. Baden
The overall division between the Priestly and non-Priestly sections of the Pentateuch is one of the aspects of the older critical consensus that has remained relatively untouched by recent debates (the other being the separateness of Deuteronomy). There has also been a widespread return to the view...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 1, Pages: 185-187 |
| Review of: | J, E, and the redaction of the Pentateuch (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2009) (Davies, Graham I.)
|
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The overall division between the Priestly and non-Priestly sections of the Pentateuch is one of the aspects of the older critical consensus that has remained relatively untouched by recent debates (the other being the separateness of Deuteronomy). There has also been a widespread return to the view that the original Priestly Work was a separate document and not a massive supplement to the older sections of the Pentateuch: only Erhard Blum takes the latter view in this volume. Even so the Priestly sections themselves have recently been the subject of a number of questions about their unity, date, and place in the composition of the Pentateuch. This volume of essays, which derives from a symposium held in 2007, provides a valuable introduction to these issues. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/fls173 |