The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia. By Joshua P. Hochschild

Since the attempt, from the middle of the twentieth century onwards, to retrieve the genuine Aquinas from the supposedly debased forms of Thomism found in the Neoscholasticism of the earlier part of the century, Cajetan’s treatise on the analogy of terms—De nominum analogia—has received rather poor...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cross, Richard 1964- (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2012, Volume: 63, Issue: 1, Pages: 360-362
Review of:The semantics of analogy (Notre Dame, Ind. : Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2010) (Cross, Richard)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Since the attempt, from the middle of the twentieth century onwards, to retrieve the genuine Aquinas from the supposedly debased forms of Thomism found in the Neoscholasticism of the earlier part of the century, Cajetan’s treatise on the analogy of terms—De nominum analogia—has received rather poor press. It was popular among Neoscholastics, and was often presented as an attempt to provide a systematization of Aquinas’ thinking on the subject. As such, commentators from the past fifty or so years have rightly found it wanting. Hochschild comes up with a novel suggestion, obvious once pointed out. The work does not present itself as an interpretation of Aquinas, so it should not be read and assessed as though it were.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/fls025