Mind, Text, and Commentary: Noetic Exegesis in Origen of Alexandria, Didymus the Blind, and Evagrius Ponticus. By Blossom Stefaniw
‘Mind, Context, and Commentary’ might have been a better title for this thoughtful and creative investigation of the socio-cultural assumptions and practices that informed the figural interpretative approaches of Origen of Alexandria, Didymus the Blind, and Evagrius Ponticus. Blossom Stefaniw presen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2012, Volume: 63, Issue: 1, Pages: 310-312 |
| Review of: | Mind, text, and commentary (Frankfurt am Main : Lang, 2010) (Kantzer Komline, Han-Luen)
|
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | ‘Mind, Context, and Commentary’ might have been a better title for this thoughtful and creative investigation of the socio-cultural assumptions and practices that informed the figural interpretative approaches of Origen of Alexandria, Didymus the Blind, and Evagrius Ponticus. Blossom Stefaniw presents a study ‘engaged not in relating the commentary to the text it proposes to interpret, but rather relating the commentary to the interpretive community which generated the interpretation in question’ (p. 377). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/fls012 |