Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. By Andrew Radde-Gallwitz

The problem of divine simplicity evidently was at the heart of the Eunomian controversy. Following his teacher Aetius, the bishop of Cyzicus argued that on account of his simplicity God could only be either ingenerate or generate. Given that he was the former, the Son, who evidently was the latter,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zachhuber, Johannes 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2011
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2011, Volume: 62, Issue: 1, Pages: 360-363
Review of:Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the transformation of divine simplicity (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2009) (Zachhuber, Johannes)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The problem of divine simplicity evidently was at the heart of the Eunomian controversy. Following his teacher Aetius, the bishop of Cyzicus argued that on account of his simplicity God could only be either ingenerate or generate. Given that he was the former, the Son, who evidently was the latter, could not be of the same or of a similar substance. Did the Cappadocians have a good answer to this straightforward and seemingly forceful argument? Considering the centrality of this issue for the final phase of the trinitarian debates in the fourth century, it is surprising how little scholarly effort has been devoted to its elucidation. The present study, a revised version of the author’s Ph.D. thesis originally written at Emory University, goes a long way to addressing this lacuna.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flq174