The Christology of Theodoret of Cyrus: Antiochene Christology from the Council of Ephesus (431) to the Council of Chalcedon (451). By Paul B. Clayton, Jr
Theodoret's Christology is not easy to pin down. Quite a number of his contemporaries supposed he shared Nestorius’ views (which to some extent he did) and believed in two Sons (which neither he nor Nestorius did). Half a millennium later, intelligent readers found it difficult to distinguish h...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2008
|
In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2008, Volume: 59, Issue: 2, Pages: 810-811 |
Review of: | The Christology of Theodoret of Cyrus (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2007) (Wickham, L. R.)
|
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Theodoret's Christology is not easy to pin down. Quite a number of his contemporaries supposed he shared Nestorius’ views (which to some extent he did) and believed in two Sons (which neither he nor Nestorius did). Half a millennium later, intelligent readers found it difficult to distinguish his Christology from Cyril's. The deacon Stylianus, copying in 932 the manuscript (belonging to Archbishop Arethas) of Cyril's controversy with Theodoret over the Twelve Chapters, wrote the marginal note: ‘To speak candidly, they attack each other erroneously saying the same thing about the same thing and working themselves up into a disagreement like people differing over a number if one says so many units are “eleven” and the other “ten and one”’ (A.C.O. I.1.6, p. 114). Paul B. Clayton, Jr. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/fln059 |