Spuren von Deuteromarkus. 4 volumes. By Albert Fuchs
In his work on the Synoptic Problem over the course of the last 30 years or so, Albert Fuchs has been a consistent and tireless advocate of the theory that the Matthew–Luke agreements against Mark in triple-tradition passages are to be explained by common use of an edited version of Mark's text...
| Summary: | In his work on the Synoptic Problem over the course of the last 30 years or so, Albert Fuchs has been a consistent and tireless advocate of the theory that the Matthew–Luke agreements against Mark in triple-tradition passages are to be explained by common use of an edited version of Mark's text, a ‘Deuteromarkus’, which is later than the version of Mark which became established as the canonical text of the Gospel. The so-called ‘minor agreements’ have always been something of a thorn in the flesh for any neat, simple version of the Two Source Theory (i.e. Matthew and Luke using what is generally assumed to be all but ‘our’ Mark, as well as ‘Q’). Although they have often been explained in a piecemeal way (e.g. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/fln040 |