Union and Distinction in the Thought of St. Maximus the Confessor. By Melchisedec Törönen

‘In philosophical terms, Maximus’ system overcomes dualism without collapsing into monism; and his theology without falling into pantheism presents, on the one hand, a “theophanic” ontology, and without becoming Origenism commends, on the other hand, a spirituality of deification’ (p. 198). This is...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Milkov, Kosta (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2008
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2008, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 384-386
Review of:Union and distinction in the thought of St. Maximus the Confessor (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2007) (Milkov, Kosta)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:‘In philosophical terms, Maximus’ system overcomes dualism without collapsing into monism; and his theology without falling into pantheism presents, on the one hand, a “theophanic” ontology, and without becoming Origenism commends, on the other hand, a spirituality of deification’ (p. 198). This is precisely what, according to Melchisedec Törönen, Maximus’ theology of simultaneous union and distinction achieves. Törönen's study is persuasive that this is really so., Before espousing the thought of Maximus on union and distinction Törönen first challenges two established opinions among Maximian scholars after the Second World War. The first finds the centre of Maximus’ theology in the Chalcedonian Definition.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/fln010