Ernan McMullin and Critical Realism in the Science–Theology Dialogue. By Paul L. Allen

The concept of critical realism has often been invoked in the contemporary dialogue between science and theology. ‘Realism’ implies at least a verisimilitudinous relation with the way things are, and the modifier ‘critical’ indicates that something more subtle than naive objectivity is involved. Sci...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Polkinghorne, John C. 1930- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Review
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2007
Em: The journal of theological studies
Ano: 2007, Volume: 58, Número: 2, Páginas: 797-799
Resenha de:Ernan McMullin and critical realism in the science-theology dialogue (Aldershot [u.a.] : Ashgate, 2006) (Polkinghorne, John C.)
Outras palavras-chave:B Resenha
Acesso em linha: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:The concept of critical realism has often been invoked in the contemporary dialogue between science and theology. ‘Realism’ implies at least a verisimilitudinous relation with the way things are, and the modifier ‘critical’ indicates that something more subtle than naive objectivity is involved. Scientist–theologians have commonly regarded the idea as applying to both science and theology, in appropriate ways, and have seen this as indicating a cousinly relationship between the two disciplines. Paul Allen's first chapter is devoted to a critical account of the use of critical realism by three such scientist–theologians: Ian Barbour, Arthur Peacocke, and the present writer.
ISSN:1477-4607
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flm066