1 Corinthians Interpreted by Early Christian Commentators. Translated and edited by Judith L. Kovacs
Judith L. Kovacs has provided a useful resource. The history of reception of the biblical writings has come to occupy an increasingly prominent place in current biblical scholarship, and rightly so. But is this a history of reception, or a history of interpretation? The General Editor's Introdu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2007, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 656-658 |
Review of: | 1 Corinthians (Grand Rapids, Mich. [u.a.] : Eerdmans, 2005) (Thiselton, Anthony C.)
|
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Judith L. Kovacs has provided a useful resource. The history of reception of the biblical writings has come to occupy an increasingly prominent place in current biblical scholarship, and rightly so. But is this a history of reception, or a history of interpretation? The General Editor's Introduction and the specific selection of sources, which are mainly extracts from Patristic commentaries, suggest the latter. However, since Brevard Childs's commentary on Exodus (1974) and Ulrich Luz's commentary on Matthew (1985–2002) the history of reception has begun to flourish as a broader and more critical subdiscipline, drawing material not only from a history of texts written as commentaries (most of which are moderately accessible), but also from doctrine, liturgy, and other texts and practices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flm049 |