Katechon: II Thess 2.1–12 im Horizont apokalyptischen Denkens. By Paul Metzger. Pp. xi + 368. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005. isbn 3 1 018460 5
Paul Metzger, in a revised version of a thesis of 2004 at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, seeks to solve the apparently intractable riddle of the neuter (or should it be masculine?) participle katechon in 2 Thess. 2: 6–7. His method is to concentrate on the historical context and exegesis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2006, Volume: 57, Issue: 2, Pages: 667-669 |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Paul Metzger, in a revised version of a thesis of 2004 at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, seeks to solve the apparently intractable riddle of the neuter (or should it be masculine?) participle katechon in 2 Thess. 2: 6–7. His method is to concentrate on the historical context and exegesis of this chapter of the letter. He then discusses parallel motifs in 2 Peter 3:3–13; Rev. 5:1–5; 6:9–11; and 7:1–8; 4 Ezra 4:33–43; the Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch; and Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum 51. 3–6 of Pseudo-Philo. He also draws comparisons with the Synoptic Apocalypse (Mark 13 and parallels) and with Qumran (1Qp Hab 7 and 1Q 27). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flj125 |