Katechon: II Thess 2.1–12 im Horizont apokalyptischen Denkens. By Paul Metzger. Pp. xi + 368. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005. isbn 3 1 018460 5

Paul Metzger, in a revised version of a thesis of 2004 at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, seeks to solve the apparently intractable riddle of the neuter (or should it be masculine?) participle katechon in 2 Thess. 2: 6–7. His method is to concentrate on the historical context and exegesis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Court, John M. 1943- (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2006
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2006, Volume: 57, Issue: 2, Pages: 667-669
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Paul Metzger, in a revised version of a thesis of 2004 at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, seeks to solve the apparently intractable riddle of the neuter (or should it be masculine?) participle katechon in 2 Thess. 2: 6–7. His method is to concentrate on the historical context and exegesis of this chapter of the letter. He then discusses parallel motifs in 2 Peter 3:3–13; Rev. 5:1–5; 6:9–11; and 7:1–8; 4 Ezra 4:33–43; the Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch; and Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum 51. 3–6 of Pseudo-Philo. He also draws comparisons with the Synoptic Apocalypse (Mark 13 and parallels) and with Qumran (1Qp Hab 7 and 1Q 27).
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flj125