[Rezension von: Thome, Felix, 1966-, Historia contra Mythos : die Schriftauslegung Diodors von Tarsus und Theodors von Mopsuestia im Widerstreit zu Kaiser Julians und Salustius' allegorischem Mythenverständnis]
Following a suggestion of A. Guida, who edited the extant fragments of Theodore of Mopsuestia's response to Julian the Apostate's Contra Galilaeos, Felix Thome embarked on a doctoral project in which he tried to demonstrate that Theodore's anti-allegorical/anti-mythical stance was gen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2005
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2005, Volume: 56, Issue: 2, Pages: 675-676 |
| Review of: | Historia contra Mythos (Bonn : Borengässer, 2004) (Lössl, Josef)
|
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Following a suggestion of A. Guida, who edited the extant fragments of Theodore of Mopsuestia's response to Julian the Apostate's Contra Galilaeos, Felix Thome embarked on a doctoral project in which he tried to demonstrate that Theodore's anti-allegorical/anti-mythical stance was generally driven by a reaction against the emperor's project to create religion from allegorizing myth, a project not all too different, it may have seemed, from that of many Christian theologians at the time. The thesis that resulted in the present book was supervised by Hermann J. Vogt, who also wrote a foreword for it. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/fli179 |