Diachrone Forschung am Buch Habakuk - am Beispiel von Hab 2,4-5
The short review shows that those exegetes, who make literary-critical differentiations, arrive at completely different conclusions. Such widely divergent hypotheses raise the question of the methods on which they are based. Literary-critical observations and claims shall be the reason to have a clo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Universität Wien, Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät, Institut für Bibelwissenschaft
2007
|
| In: |
Protokolle zur Bibel
Year: 2007, Volume: 16, Issue: 2, Pages: 87-101 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The short review shows that those exegetes, who make literary-critical differentiations, arrive at completely different conclusions. Such widely divergent hypotheses raise the question of the methods on which they are based. Literary-critical observations and claims shall be the reason to have a closer literary-critical look at the small section of Hab 2:4-5. Particularly interesting is the question whether the theological core V. 4 can be regarded as a unit or not. The result is that V. 4b (MT) is no part of the immediate context of Hab 2:4-5! It rather constitutes a partial text of its own. Due to the fact that this core verse obviously appears to be a secondary insertion, which originally did not belong to that context, it is legitimate and necessary to search for further contexts for its understanding. This can happen within the framework of a „canonical approach“. This methodological approach therefore receives its authorisation and justification from the literary-critical inhomogeneity of its direct context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2412-2467 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Protokolle zur Bibel
|