Contesting dishonesty: when and why perspective-taking decreases ethical tolerance of marketplace deception

Deception is common in the marketplace where individuals pursue self-interests from their perspectives. Extant research suggests that perspective-taking, a cognitive process of putting oneself in other's situation, increases consumers' ethical tolerance for marketers' deceptive behavi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Xie, Guang-Xin (Author) ; Chang, Hua (Author) ; Rank-Christman, Tracy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2022
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 175, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-133
Further subjects:B Perspective-taking
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Moral self-awareness
B Ethical tolerance
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Deception is common in the marketplace where individuals pursue self-interests from their perspectives. Extant research suggests that perspective-taking, a cognitive process of putting oneself in other's situation, increases consumers' ethical tolerance for marketers' deceptive behaviors. By contrast, the current research demonstrates that consumers (as observers) who take the dishonest marketers’ perspective (vs. not) become less tolerant of deception when consumers' moral self-awareness is high. This effect is driven by moral self-other differentiation as consumers contemplate deception from the marketers' perspective: high awareness of the "moral self" motivates consumers to distance themselves from the "immoral other." The findings shed new light on how self-morality can vicariously shape social consideration in ethical judgments.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04582-6