Social media as a form of virtual whistleblowing: empirical evidence for elements of the diamond model

This article originally advances the field of organizational whistleblowing by empirically investigating the suitability of the four elements of the fraud diamond as a means to understand the intention to disclose wrongdoing through virtual channels. This article also makes a contribution on the the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Latan, Hengky (Author) ; Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José (Author) ; Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2021
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 174, Issue: 3, Pages: 529-548
Further subjects:B Business Ethics
B Capability
B Opportunity
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Financial incentive
B Rationalization
B Online whistleblowing
B Pressure
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article originally advances the field of organizational whistleblowing by empirically investigating the suitability of the four elements of the fraud diamond as a means to understand the intention to disclose wrongdoing through virtual channels. This article also makes a contribution on the theme of whistleblowing as it relates to customers, an under-studied, however, relevant stakeholder in this field. The main findings of the article are as follows: (a) the four elements of the fraud diamond as they relate to whistleblowing—a combination of pressure, financial incentive, opportunity and rationalization, and capability—can explain the intentions behind customer reports of wrongdoing; (b) online social media channels are customers’ preferred means of whistleblowing; (c) the elements of opportunity and capability are strongly correlated with the use of social media as a method of disclosing wrongdoing; and (d) virtual channels can be useful for whistleblowers in order to avoid potential retaliation. Unique managerial and academic implications of these research findings are also discussed, extending the layers of knowledge on whistleblowing in organizations.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04598-y