‘Kierkegaard’: A Reasonable Fideist?

The task I set myself is to identify whether Climacus is an extreme or moderate fideist, and to go on to evaluate how convincing or persuasive I find Climacus' position. Separating metaphysical and epistemological fideism, I spend the first section of the article denying that Climacus is a ‘met...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Insole, Christopher (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1998
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 1998, Volume: 39, Issue: 4, Pages: 363-378
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1781941637
003 DE-627
005 20211211043238.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211211s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1468-2265.00084  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1781941637 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1781941637 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Insole, Christopher  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ‘Kierkegaard’: A Reasonable Fideist? 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The task I set myself is to identify whether Climacus is an extreme or moderate fideist, and to go on to evaluate how convincing or persuasive I find Climacus' position. Separating metaphysical and epistemological fideism, I spend the first section of the article denying that Climacus is a ‘metaphysical fideist’. This involves looking at the notion of ‘truth as subjectivity’. I will claim that in expounding this notorious maxim Climacus can be seen as expressing something almost trivially obvious and/or something substantially wrong. I will further argue that even the obvious version of the maxim needs to be heavily qualified before it can be a sufficient account of ‘religious truth’. In the second section of the article I argue that Climacus should be understood as a moderate fideist, who considers that reason should assent to its own limitations. Although I will approve of reason-exhausting projects, I will complain that the paradox which is supposed to so exhaust my reason does not perplex me in the relevant sense. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 39(1998), 4, Seite 363-378  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:39  |g year:1998  |g number:4  |g pages:363-378 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1468-2265.00084  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00084  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2265.00084  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4019074615 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1781941637 
LOK |0 005 20211211043238 
LOK |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-09#34D76EAEE3434D12A499F9FA00D1169D08E5B466 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw