Defending the Indefensible: Joanna Hoyt and Repentance in Judges
Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evi...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
The National Association of Professors of Hebrew
2021
|
| In: |
Hebrew studies
Year: 2021, 卷: 62, Pages: 73-93 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Antwort
/ Bibel. 法官
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HD Early Judaism |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2158-1681 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Hebrew studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/hbr.2021.0011 |