Karl Barth’s Christology and Jan Christian Smuts’ Human Rights Rhetoric

South African statesman Jan Christian Smuts’ (1870-1950) domestic and international politics diverge greatly; his domestic policy has been eschewed as a precursor to apartheid (1948-1994), but his international policy heralded for advancing human rights rhetoric because he authored the charters for...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolff, Michelle (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Stellenbosch University 2019
In: Stellenbosch theological journal
Year: 2019, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 141-161
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
FD Contextual theology
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KBN Sub-Saharan Africa
KDD Protestant Church
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:South African statesman Jan Christian Smuts’ (1870-1950) domestic and international politics diverge greatly; his domestic policy has been eschewed as a precursor to apartheid (1948-1994), but his international policy heralded for advancing human rights rhetoric because he authored the charters for both the League of Nations (1920) and United Nations (1945). Scholars struggle to reconcile these seemingly conflicting legacies. WEB du Bois, Peder Anker, and Saul Dubow suggest that Smuts embodies capitalist greed, bad science, and redefined political terms. I argue that Karl Barth’s theology adroitly illuminates the problem of empire for Smuts and present day appeals to human rights rhetoric. Barth’s theology poses a three-fold challenge to Smuts. First, Barth articulates a critique of natural theology found embedded within Smuts’ philosophy of holism; second, Barth critiques liberal politics that Smuts typifies; and, third, Barth’s refusal to side with Eastern or Western empires runs counter to Smuts’ imperial sensibilities. Ultimately, I argue that Barth’s Christology offers a constructive alternative vision for sociality.
ISSN:2413-9467
Contains:Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17570/stj.2019.v5n1.a08