Erratum: Comment: What's in a name?

Erratum. New Blackfriars Volume 86, Number 1004 In this article by Fergus Kerr in Volume 86, Number 1004, July 2005: - p. 360, line 5 of text: ‘He reaffirms his predecessor's condemnation of “Modernism” (he is said to have found a document delating himself in the papal in-tray); but, by these “...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 2005
In: New blackfriars
Year: 2005, Volume: 86, Issue: 1005, Pages: 564
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Erratum. New Blackfriars Volume 86, Number 1004 In this article by Fergus Kerr in Volume 86, Number 1004, July 2005: - p. 360, line 5 of text: ‘He reaffirms his predecessor's condemnation of “Modernism” (he is said to have found a document delating himself in the papal in-tray); but, by these “new terms”’ should read: ‘He reaffirms his predecessor's condemnation of “Modernism” (he is said to have found a document delating himself in the papal in-tray); but, by these “new terms”, he means the categorization of Catholics as “modernists” and “integrists”.’
ISSN:1741-2005
Reference:Errata zu "Comment: What's in a name? (2005)"
Contains:Enthalten in: New blackfriars
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/j.0028-4289.2005.00110.x