Emotional Significance and Predation’s Uneasy Conscience in John of Salisbury and Chrétien’s Perceval
In John of Salisbury’s 1159 Policraticus, as in Patrick Colm Hogan’s cognitive and Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic literary criticism, bodily vulnerability anchors human perception of significance, and so emotional life, in the pursuit of one’s own flourishing—and that of one’s in-group’s success. B...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado em: |
2014
|
Em: |
Literature and theology
Ano: 2014, Volume: 28, Número: 3, Páginas: 284-298 |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Resumo: | In John of Salisbury’s 1159 Policraticus, as in Patrick Colm Hogan’s cognitive and Julia Kristeva’s psychoanalytic literary criticism, bodily vulnerability anchors human perception of significance, and so emotional life, in the pursuit of one’s own flourishing—and that of one’s in-group’s success. But in both cognitive and psychoanalytic accounts, and in John, oral-aggressive predatory dispositions and value systems are subject to constant disruption by non-egocentric modes of registering significance. Read through Hogan and Kristeva, John’s combined emotion theory and political theory illuminate how Chrétien’s 1180s Perceval links the politics of predatory self-advancement to forms of psychic entrapment that only dispositional and political respect for sociality and pluralism might undo. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-4623 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Literature and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/litthe/fru021 |