Are Natural and Unnatural Appetites Equally Controllable? A Response to Jensen's “Is Continence Enough?”
This response challenges Jensen's analysis in no substantial way. Rather, it explains more fully some of the moral character categories that Aristotle provides. It argues that Aristotle understood there to be two forms of continence: the continence that enables us to control natural appetites a...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Έκδοση: |
2004
|
Στο/Στη: |
Christian bioethics
Έτος: 2004, Τόμος: 10, Τεύχος: 2/3, Σελίδες: 177-188 |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή
|
Σύνοψη: | This response challenges Jensen's analysis in no substantial way. Rather, it explains more fully some of the moral character categories that Aristotle provides. It argues that Aristotle understood there to be two forms of continence: the continence that enables us to control natural appetites and “some form” of continence directed towards unnatural appetites, generally engendered by some pathology or abuse. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-4195 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Christian bioethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13803600490898056 |