Desire’s revelatory conflagration
Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical w...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2017
|
| Dans: |
Theology & sexuality
Année: 2017, Volume: 23, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 48-66 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
apophatic theology
B antagonism B Pseudo-dionysius B Lee Edelman B Georges Bataille B Guy Hocquenghem |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical without reserve, and only then can it avoid the antagonisms that comprise the social order. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1341206 |