Desire’s revelatory conflagration
Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical w...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2017
|
En: |
Theology & sexuality
Año: 2017, Volumen: 23, Número: 1/2, Páginas: 48-66 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
apophatic theology
B antagonism B Pseudo-dionysius B Lee Edelman B Georges Bataille B Guy Hocquenghem |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Sumario: | Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical without reserve, and only then can it avoid the antagonisms that comprise the social order. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1341206 |