Response: The Material Conditions for Theorizing Maternality, or Why Is It so Difficult to Think about Being a Mother?

In response to the four essays preceding, this article considers the question: “why it is so difficult to think maternality?” In different ways, all four of the essays in this special issue attest to the dangers of essentializing a connection between “woman” and “mother.” In order to disentangle thi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jones, Tamsin 1974- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2013
In: Theology & sexuality
Year: 2013, Volume: 19, Issue: 3, Pages: 283-295
Further subjects:B maternality
B Feminism
B Materiality
B Psychoanalysis
B Existential phenomenology
B “lived body”
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:In response to the four essays preceding, this article considers the question: “why it is so difficult to think maternality?” In different ways, all four of the essays in this special issue attest to the dangers of essentializing a connection between “woman” and “mother.” In order to disentangle this link, one strategy is to theorize maternality as positively distinct from materiality. The article argues, instead, that a material grounding of maternality might in fact be shown to offer a way out of essentialist (and other equally-limiting) discourses, while at the same time responding to some of the material conditions that threaten theoretical discussions of what it means to be a “mother.”
ISSN:1745-5170
Contains:Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1179/1355835814Z.00000000035