The Lure of Pan(en)theism: Difference and Desire in Divine Enticement
This response to Karmen MacKendrick’s work follows the thematic trail of desire through Divine Enticement (2012), seeking to clarify the relationship in MacKendrick’s work between God and creation. While MacKendrick expresses an initial desire for an “immanent divine,” especially in relation to the...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2012
|
| En: |
Theology & sexuality
Año: 2012, Volumen: 18, Número: 2, Páginas: 113-117 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Cusa
B Augustine B Bruno B Pantheism B Desire B Panentheism |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | This response to Karmen MacKendrick’s work follows the thematic trail of desire through Divine Enticement (2012), seeking to clarify the relationship in MacKendrick’s work between God and creation. While MacKendrick expresses an initial desire for an “immanent divine,” especially in relation to the work of St. Augustine, she later feels more drawn to “a world that in its beauty calls out the name of its creator” than to a world “in which the creator is simply present.” This brief engagement explores MacKendrick’s logic of seduction in relation to the panentheist and pantheist theologies of Cusa and Bruno, ultimately suggesting that “immanence” only collapses the distance of desire if creation is understood to be finite and self-identical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1179/1355835813Z.00000000012 |